Attention: SCIENTISTS, PHYSICISTS and OTHER ASSORTED 'BACKYARD'
SCIENTIFIC TYPES: LEARN FROM AN ACTUAL INSIDER THE SECRETS OF THE ALIEN PROPULSION SYSTEM AND WHY WE CAN'T 'CRACK' AND DUPLICATE IT! / LEARN WHAT MAKES THE ET CRAFT GO FROM POINT "A" to "B" WITH LITTLE FUEL ON HAND, BUT "WHICH CREATES ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF ENERGY!" / UNDERSTAND WHY "2 + 2 = 5" IN THE REST OF THE COSMOS EXCEPT HERE ON PRIMITIVE PLANET EARTH! / LEARN THE PROPER PLACE FOR OUR QUANTUM PHYSICS and MECHANICS ... IN THE LATRINE! / THIS IS A "KEEPER!"
MODERATOR's NOTES and EXPLANATION: What follows is an exclusive
interview between an Area 51 scientist and Linda Moulton-Howe conducted
in April of 1995.
To the best of ANONYMOUS and the DIA-6's knowledge, THE CONTENTS OF THIS
EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW HAVE NEVER BEEN MADE PUBLIC perhaps due to the
agreement Moulton-Howe entered into with the USG at the time of the
interview.
In a telephone call I placed to the residence of Moulton-Howe on Sunday
morning, 6-17-07, I have confirmed with her that the following interview
never appeared on her Web site:
Regardless, ANONYMOUS has now directed me to release an abstract of the
5-page interview which is reproduced below.
As always, my OWN comments/notes are offset by the use of [ ] brackets.
- BEGIN -
------------------------------------------
This is raw intelligence material and dissemination to unauthorized
personnel is prohibited.
This attachment was not given a security classification.
Interview with Dr Craig McPherson, scientist and former employee of Area
51.
Dr McPherson worked at Area 51 from May 1956 until September 1988. This
interview was made by Linda Howe during a meeting at the Las Vegas
Hilton on April 8, 1995. Under a written agreement between Linda Howe
and Dr McPherson, the contents of the interview could NOT be made
public. A U.S. government source recorded the interview. What follows is
a summary of the information given by Dr McPherson.
NOTE: A background check of Dr Craig H McPherson was conducted. Dr
McPherson obtained a security clearance based on an "Expanded Background
Investigation" in August of 1956. The clearance was upgraded at various
intervals until his retirement. Dr McPherson was a Federal Civil Service
employee from May 23, 1956 until October 1, 1988.
Dr McPherson retired at the Federal Civil Service grade of GS-16. Dr
McPherson was born on April 8, 1920 in Scranton, PA. Dr McPherson served
in the U.S. Army Infantry in Europe from June 1944 until October 1946.
Dr McPherson obtained the military rank of Sergeant at the time of his
discharge. Dr McPherson attended Penn State University, the University
of Pennsylvania and MIT.
Interview of Dr Craig McPherson by Linda Howe on April 8, 1995.
Location: Las Vegas, NV. Time frame: 1224 hrs - 1713 hrs.
[Dr Craig McPherson begins speaking.]
I served in the U.S. Army from 1944 to 1946. After discharge, I attended
college and eventually obtained a PhD in physics. I worked for private
industry from 1955 to 1956. In May 1956, I was hired by the U.S. Air
Force as an Applied Physics Specialist.
My first assignment was at the Nellis AFB, NV, test facility. I worked
at Indian Springs AFB, NV, for the first seven months. My work pertained
to the examination of Foreign Technology. The foreign technology
consisted of Soviet and Chinese equipment. Most of the equipment was
obtained from a friendly government. The equipment consisted of tanks,
electronics equipment, weapon systems and other related items.
During this time frame, the Air Force built an underground facility at
Groom Lake. The construction started in 1955 and ended sometime during
the summer of 1959. I worked in the Foreign Technology Applications
Studies Division (FTASD). We had three (3) different facilities, two of
them at Groom Lake and one at Indian Springs. We later obtained a
facility at Tonopah.
Once the underground facility was ready, we moved in. This was sometime
in early 1960. The facility was one of the biggest underground
facilities ever built. We must have had over a billion square feet of
space. In later years, the underground facility, code named "Deep
Space," was expanded to include three (3) different levels.
I was involved in the research and development of the SR-71. We had
several different aircraft on the drawing board. The FTASD had more than
65 scientists, technicians and military personnel assigned. Most of our
work was very unique. We would obtain some information from the Foreign
Technology Acquisition Group (FTAG).
This group obtained information from foreign governments or from
intelligence agencies. Along with the studies of the foreign equipment
that we had available at the facility, we could apply advanced
scientific principles to further our own technology. We made terrific
advancements during this time frame.
During this time period, I NEVER saw a UFO or anything resembling a UFO
at the Groom Lake Test Facility. I did NOT see any ETs nor did I ever
hear anyone mention that our government was reverse engineering an ET
device.
In the summer of 1969, I was transferred from the FTASD to the Advance
Studies Group (ASG). The ASG was a very secret group located in the
second level of Area 51, Complex III. When I first entered the facility,
I had to obtain an additional security clearance. During my in-briefing
of the ASG, I was informed that our group was working on advanced
research principles involving NONconventional flying devices.
I saw my first nonconventional device within a few days of being
assigned to the ASG. The flying device was code named "Atlas-Tank" (AT).
It was A FLYING SAUCER. I worked on specific physics problems associated
with this unique design. We had manufactured the AT over a period of
eight (8) years.
I was brought into the program during the latter part of the ground
testing. We solved most of the unique problems, but we still could not
get the AT to fly. Several different propulsion systems were used, but
none of them worked. Sometime in 1973, I was given another security
clearance. I was moved to another facility within Complex III. This was
a new facility. I was assigned to the ASG-Alpha.
Once in the facility, I was given access to another "flying saucer."
This appeared to be the same shape as the AT. However, it was code named
"Blue Chariot." Although I did not have access to the interior of the
BC, I did observe the outer area of the flying craft. At no time was I
told that either of these flying machines were ET related. I worked in
the Alpha branch for several months before moving back to ASG.
In 1973, a terrible accident occurred at the Complex III facility. The
propulsion system on the BC was activated and an explosion occurred
killing six (6) technicians. Actually, it was NOT an explosion. A bolt
or plasma ball came out of the propulsion system and struck the
technicians, VAPORIZING THEM. The BC was then taken to another facility,
which was located in a very remote area of Area 51. This area was
adjacent to the old above ground nuclear testing land.
Scientists learned how the propulsion system worked. They could activate
the system, which would generate an enormous amount of energy. The
energy could be formed into "balls of plasma" or a steady stream of
energy. The system could generate energy equivalent to a nuclear
explosion from a range of 0.1 kT up to 350 kT.
The strange thing about this energy system was the lack of radiation.
The system could generate this enormous amount of power, but it would
NOT leave any residual radiation. This puzzled scientists. When I
retired in 1988, NO ONE could understand the system. They could activate
it, but could NOT understand how it worked.
At no time was I ever told that the new propulsion system was given to
us by ETs. Nor was I ever told that ETs provided us with any technology.
We assumed the new propulsion system was developed by the Soviets.
Although no one told us that the new propulsion system and the BC were
ET related, we figured they that were.
We had our own private discussions about the technology. I could give
you the technical details of the propulsion system, but that is still
HIGHLY CLASSIFIED. I can say the system operates on some unknown
principles. We tried, quite unsuccessfully, to apply our knowledge of
physics, quantum theory and other principles to this new system.
In OUR science, there are two (2) basic types of bonds by which atoms
form molecules - ionic and covalent bonds. An atom is normally
electrically neutral. It has the same number of positively charged
protons in its nucleus as it has negatively charged electrons in captive
orbits.
In THIS system things are different. There is an UNKNOWN METHOD by which
the atoms are changed. Instead of ionic or covalent bonds, this new
system creates a THIRD TYPE of bonding principle. This new type of
bonding causes atoms to take on a different form. Atoms go from a normal
state -- and when I say "normal," I mean normal in OUR science -- to a
"multiplexed" form. In other words, the atoms are doubled or
"piggy-backed" onto each other.
The atoms are somewhat mutated, but maintain their original shape. I
KNOW THIS IS VERY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. That is why we still DON'T
understand it. I'll give you a simple example.
If you can recall basic chemistry, you will remember that a hydrogen
atom consists of a single proton -- the nucleus -- with one electron in
a captive state. When two hydrogen atoms approach each other, their
combined energy becomes lower if they SHARE their electrons. Well, in
this new system, a hydrogen atom, subjected to this new system (inside
this propulsion system) changes to a NEW principle.
First, when two hydrogen atoms approach each other, their combined
energy level becomes MULTIPLIED through this strange bonding principle.
So, instead of having a lower energy level, the energy is MULTIPLIED by
the number of atoms of hydrogen that is bonded. If we used the QUANTUM
IDEA to understand this, we would conclude that quantum principles do
NOT work in this new system.
Normally, in our system, positively-charged ions attract and bond to
negatively-charged ions to form molecules. This is NOT the case in this
new system. It makes NO difference whether the ions are positive or
negative as they bond together regardless of valence. We do know that
inside this propulsion system, something causes these strange unnatural
phenomena to occur.
Two plates of metal sit inside a chamber. This chamber is a vacuum. The
chamber is a PERFECT VACUUM, that is, there is no outside air or other
gases inside this chamber. A tube running from one chamber into another,
pushes a gas inside. A third chamber forces still another gas to enter
the first chamber. We know that the gases push against these two plates
of metal and cause an ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF ENERGY TO BE CREATED.
Lastly, just before the gases are "mixed," there is a form of light that
is focused against the outgoing energy. This light is of a lower
frequency. Normally, in our quantum theory, a small frequency means a
lower energy. However, is this system, the lower frequency of light was
measured to contain an enormous amount of energy exerted upon this
outgoing energy. When I left in 1988, we could NOT understand how the
gases were mixed nor could we determine HOW the light was generated.
You ask about the metals inside this vacuum container. Quite intriguing.
First, the metal strips are located inside Container #1. They are
setting perpendicular to each other at exactly 6.54 cm apart. Each metal
strip measures 18.45 cm x 9.43 cm. Each metal strip is 3.46 cm wide. The
sides of the strips facing each other contain a shiny metal coating. The
opposite sides contain a dull coating.
Looking at the metal strips from above, one will notice that another
substance is sandwiched between the outer two substances. The materials
in each of the metal strips have never been identified. We do know the
density of the metal strips and the hardness as measured by the Mohs
scale.
The density of the metal strips are 94.5 [9.45?] on the shiny side and
34.2 [3.42?] on the opposite side. I believe the density or specific
gravity was measured by the conventional method, in that the value is
grams per centimeter cubed. NOT being a metallurgist, I cannot make
comments on these values. But what IS interesting is that these two
strips of metals are located inside a somewhat round vacuum container.
The outer coating of this container is also shiny.
You mention the gases. I am not a chemist. I knew very little about the
types. One is a gas-liquid type and the other is a solid gas. Don't ask
me to explain these two; I don't believe that our chemical engineers
could do that. I just know that once the device is activated, the two
gases mix and create energy by some method.
I DON'T want my name connected to a story about ETs.
- END -
More to come....
- ANONYMOUS
------------------------------------------
MODERATOR's FOOTNOTES:
COVALENT BOND: A chemical bond formed when electrons are shared between
two atoms. Usually, each atom contributes one electron to form a pair of
electrons that are shared by both atoms.
IONIC BOND: A chemical bond formed between two ions with opposite
charges. Ionic bonds form when one atom gives up one or more electrons
to another atom. These bonds can form between a pair of atoms or between
molecules and are the type of bond found in salts.
IONIC PROPULSION: Propulsion by the reactive thrust of a high-speed beam
of similarly charged ions ejected by an ion engine.
KILOTON: The explosive force of 1,000 tons of TNT; a unit for measuring
the power of thermonuclear weapons.
MOHS SCALE: Hardness is one of the chief ways used to recognize a
mineral. It is a scale used to measure the relative hardness of a
mineral by its resistance to scratching. In 1822, Friedrich Mohs
[German-Austrian: 1773-1839] created a hardness scale based on assigning
numbers to common minerals. The concept is that a harder mineral (one
with a higher number) can scratch a softer one.
Other materials may be correlated to this scale. For example, steel used
in a pocketknife is about 5.5 and glass is about 6, so glass can scratch
steel, but a common pocketknife will NOT scratch glass.
From softest to hardest, the 10 minerals of the Mohs scale are:
talc = measuring 1 on the hardness scale
gypsum = 2
calcite = 3
fluorite = 4
apatite = 5
orthoclase feldspar = 6
quartz = 7
topaz = 8
corundum = 9 (including ruby and sapphire)
diamond = 10 / A mineral form of carbon that is extremely hard and
transparent. It usually occurs as crystals shaped as octahedrons.
Diamonds come from unusual structures similar to volcanoes called pipes;
the diamonds are embedded in a mineral called kimberlite. Diamonds form
at great depths under high pressure and temperature, then are carried to
the surface in a kimberlite pipe. Because diamonds are hard and resist
wear, they also survive passage from original locations into gravel
deposits in rivers and on beaches.
Reference:
METALS/MINERALS ADDENDUM:
The Mohs scale is a RELATIVE hardness scale (minerals relative to each
other.)
There are several more hardness scales. One scale is known as the
ABSOLUTE HARDNESS scale:
Talc = 1
Gypsum = 2
Calcite = 9
Fluorite = 21
Apatite = 48
Orthoclase = 72
Quartz = 100
Topaz = 200
Corundum = 400
Diamond = 1500
For example, this scale indicates that corundum is twice as hard as
topaz, and diamond is almost four times as hard as corundum.
Reference:
It is unclear whether Dr Craig McPherson was giving hardness numbers on
the Absolute scale, such as 94.5, while previously referring to the Mohs
scale. Metals (such as a typical knife blade) can be above 50 on the
Absolute hardness scale, and hardened steel can be 100 or more.
------------------------------------------
Sources: THE AMERICAN HERITAGE SCIENCE DICTIONARY, ISBN# 0618455043,
$19.95, 695 pp.
DISCOVER THE SCIENCE ALMANAC: THE DEFINITIVE SCIENCE RESOURCE, ISBN#
0786887591, $13.99, 790 pp.
------------------------------------------
LATE-BREAKING RELATED DEVELOPMENT TO "Project SERPO" POSTING #24:
ENORMOUS NEW HANGAR UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT AREA 51 ... IS ET MOVING IN
PERMANENTLY COME NOVEMBER 2009?!
FLASH NOTICE: Here is an item of interest for the public, since our
hard-earned tax dollars are involved, and hopefully, at work at the base
for our "Visitor" friends! The estimated size is 200 ft x 500 ft and 100
feet tall.
After the Air Force took over in the late 1980s, the name Area 51 was
officially changed to: AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER, DETACHMENT 3 or
AFFTC DET 3. This is still the official designation of the Groom Lake
base.
© 2007 Dreamland Resort.com / PHOTO: June 10, 2007 from Tikaboo Peak.
To discuss this release on the Open Minds Forum, please Click HERE.
Comentários